Cross examination must be included in what part of an officer's testimony?

Cross-examination occurs after direct testimony has been presented. During direct testimony, a witness, including an officer, provides their account of events and any relevant information regarding the case at hand. This initial questioning allows the officer to present evidence and their perspective in a coherent manner.

Once the direct testimony is complete, opposing counsel is given the opportunity to conduct a cross-examination. This phase is critical as it allows the opposing party to challenge the officer’s accounts, question the credibility of the testimony, and attempt to expose any weaknesses or biases in the provided information. Therefore, the correct understanding is that cross-examination is inherently linked to the phase of testimony known as direct testimony, making it a fundamental part of the process that ensures a fair legal proceeding.

The other options pertain to specific types of testimony or statements that do not encompass the nature of cross-examination. For example, rebuttal testimony addresses responses to claims made in direct testimony or evidence presented by the opposing side, but does not capture the initial account given by the officer that cross-examination addresses. Similarly, opinion testimony and recorded statements serve different purposes that are distinct from the process of questioning through cross-examination.