Which court case focused on roadblock legality?

The case that focused on the legality of roadblocks is Bettencourt vs. Las Cruces. This case examines the constitutional implications of police roadblocks, particularly in the context of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The courts have scrutinized the conditions under which roadblocks can be established, particularly with regard to their purpose, the manner of conducting them, and the overall impact on citizens’ rights.

In Bettencourt vs. Las Cruces, the legal arguments center around whether the roadblock was justified and executed in a way that is consistent with constitutional protections. This case serves as a significant reference point regarding how law enforcement must balance public safety measures and individual rights when implementing roadblocks.

The other cases listed, while important in the realm of law enforcement and constitutional law, do not primarily deal with roadblock legality. For example, New Jersey vs. T.L.O. pertains to search and seizure in a school context, Riley vs. California deals with warrantless searches of cell phones, and Katz vs. United States addresses the expectation of privacy in public places. Each of these cases contributes to a broader understanding of individual rights under the law but does not focus directly on police roadblocks like Bettencourt vs.