Which court case is associated with the legalities surrounding roadblocks?

The case that is associated with the legalities surrounding roadblocks is indeed Bettencourt vs. Las Cruces. This case addressed the constitutionality of police roadblocks and the legal standards that govern them, particularly in relation to the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. The court's decision in this case helped clarify the conditions under which law enforcement may legally establish roadblocks, taking into account factors such as the necessity for public safety and the potential infringement on individual rights.

On the other hand, Miranda vs. Arizona focuses on the rights of individuals in custody and the requirement for police to inform them of their rights to silence and legal counsel before interrogation. Gideon vs. Wainwright addresses the right to counsel, ensuring that defendants have access to legal representation even if they cannot afford it. Terry vs. Ohio deals with stop-and-frisk procedures, establishing the standards for stopping and detaining individuals on the basis of reasonable suspicion. While these cases are all significant in criminal law, they do not specifically address the legality of roadblocks in law enforcement.