Which court case is associated with the rights of individuals during custodial interrogation?

The case associated with the rights of individuals during custodial interrogation is Miranda v. Arizona. This landmark Supreme Court decision established the requirement that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights to an attorney and against self-incrimination before being interrogated.

The ruling was based on the principle that the coercive nature of custodial interrogation can lead to involuntary confessions, which violates the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. By implementing the "Miranda rights," law enforcement ensures that suspects are aware of their rights and can make informed decisions about whether to speak with police. This case underscored the importance of protecting individual rights in the criminal justice process, aiming to prevent abuses during interrogation and uphold fair legal practices.

The other cases listed, while significant in their own right, address different legal principles. Roe v. Wade pertains to abortion rights; Gideon v. Wainwright focuses on the right to counsel in criminal cases; and Brown v. Board of Education deals with racial segregation in schools. These distinctions highlight the specific focus of Miranda v. Arizona on the rights of individuals during police interrogations.